2018年9月29日土曜日

Why do we believe in this mumbo-jumbo? Albert Einstein must be turning over in his grave. Published: 29th September 2018 04:00 AM | Last Updated: 29th September 2018 01:04 AM | A+A A- amit bandre

Why do we believe in this mumbo-jumbo?
Albert Einstein must be turning over in his grave.

 
Published: 29th September 2018 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th September 2018 01:04 AM   |  A+A A-
amit bandre
By Sujata Anandan
Albert Einstein must be turning over in his grave. After decades of celebration as a Nobel Prize winning physicist, known for his theory of relativity and the equation E = mc2, we are now told he did not have the brains to get the formula right. Why? Because he was a non-vegetarian! Non-vegetarian brains are jerky, so he went E = m(jerk)c(jerk)square. On the other hand, a vegetarian would have had a smoother formula—E equals emmceesquaare. Without the jerks and all the necessary drawls in place.

I am sure the originator of this vegetarian-non-vegetarian jerk theory deserves a Nobel Prize—Einstein’s prize in fact. They should snatch that Nobel away and award it to this newest scientist on the block. Oh, but wait! What is the scientific basis for this new theory? Brain-mapping? Experimentation in the laboratory?

Einstein was said to have a high IQ of 160 and his formula has had a great influence on the philosophy of science. Einstein’s may not have produced the bomb in the laboratory but his E = mc2 is the formula that led to the production of the first nuclear bombs in this world. The rest, as they say, is history.
But now the man challenging Einstein’s theory of relativity is no trained scientist.

It is controversial godman Swami Nityananda who described Einstein’s brain as crooked, adding, “E equals to not mc2. Cannot be mc2. What is mc2? The difference between intensity and continuity. What is energy? What is matter? Matter is continuity, energy is intensity. What do you call matter? Anything continuous. What do you call energy? Anything intense. The intensity and continuity is separate for a non-veg crooked brain which has seen only ups and downs. Only a vegetarian brain which can retain the experience continuously without losing the intensity can understand ‘m’ and ‘c’ is not ‘em-cee’.

It’s emmcee.”

Mumbo-jumbo? Not to worry—there are more such confusing theories from people who may not be so rooted in their faith in God but have tremendous belief in their own ability to engineer miracles. Manohar alias Sambhaji Bhide, the man rendered notorious for his alleged involvement in the riots of Bhima-Koregaon near Pune on January 1 this year, can help you conceive a son if you only have daughters. But for that you would have to eat mangoes from one particular tree in his orchard, he claimed. The Nashik Municipal Corporation promptly filed a case against this former professor from the upmarket Fergusson College in Pune for misleading the people.

The health department of the Nashik Municipal Corporation held a probe and filed charges against Bhide for violating Section 22 of the PCPNDT Act (prohibition of advertisement relating to pre-conception and pre-natal determination of sex and punishment for contravention). Bhide has been dodging the notice and the civic body now plans to go to court. But Union Minister of State for Home Satyapal Singh took the cake a few months ago when he challenged Darwin’s theory of evolution and denied human beings had evolved from apes. “No human being ever saw another morph from an ape.”

The minister insisted on changing the syllabi in schools on the theory of evolution accordingly. The amazing thing about Singh’s low scientific knowledge is that he was a former commissioner of police in Mumbai, had scored high in his IPS exams and is a Masters in Chemistry besides. When people laughed and booed at him, he stuck doggedly to his own theory of evolution—which was nothing but an indigenous version of Adam and Eve and continues to propagate his fantastic theories to whoever cares
to listen.

But now the worst kind of spin and falsehoods come from an anglicised godman. It has been easier to call him out because he has been less obscurantist and more political in his statements. He recently claimed that there have been no bomb blasts in India over the past four years.

The godman was instantly trolled on social media with many people pointing out 400-plus blasts including in states like Maharashtra, Manipur and Chhattisgarh and, of course, Jammu and Kashmir—all IED  devices which are the favourite of home-grown terrorists.




The godman’s discourses are always banal and full of inanities but what appalled me most was his recent statement on unemployment in India. I am appalled that he should stand before a roomful of top-ranking B-school students and tell them not to talk about unemployment because jobs were aplenty in the country but not enough people to do them!

What did the godman mean? Should a top management graduate apply for vacancies in the municipal corporation for the jobs of scavengers or sweepers? Or a science graduate set up an aloo-bonda stall outside his former college?

I wonder why we are letting godmen peddling pseudoscience into our lives or even falling for their unscientific gibberish. We take so much pride in our ancient scientists like Aryabhatta and Brahmagupta. Do we really want to replace them with such know-nothings in the common public perception?http://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2018/sep/29/why-do-we-believe-in-this-mumbo-jumbo-1878492.html

ゼロ除算の発見は日本です:
∞???    
∞は定まった数ではない・・・・
人工知能はゼロ除算ができるでしょうか:

とても興味深く読みました:2014年2月2日 4周年を超えました:
ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した:日本、再生核研究所


ゼロ除算関係論文・本


\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\title{\bf  Announcement 454:  The International Conference on Applied Physics and Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, October 22-23}
\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\
kbdmm360@yahoo.co.jp
 }
\date{2018.9.29}
\maketitle
{\Large \bf
 The Institute of Reproducing Kernels is dealing with the theory of division by zero calculus and declares that the division by zero was discovered as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$ in a natural sense on 2014.2.2. The result shows a new basic idea on the universe and space based on the new concept of division by zero calculus: for the function $f(z) = 1/z$
$$
f(0) = 0
$$
 since Aristotelēs (BC384 - BC322) and Euclid (BC 3 Century - ), and the division by zero is since Brahmagupta  (598 - 668 ?).
In particular,  Brahmagupta defined as $0/0=0$ in Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta (628), however, our world history stated that his definition $0/0=0$ is wrong over 1300 years, but, we showed that his definition is suitable.
 For the details, see the site: http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/
\medskip

In the above international conference:
\medskip

\medskip

John Martin, Program Coordinator\\
http://www.meetingsint.com/conferences/\\appliedphysics-mathematics\\Applied Physics and Mathematics Conference 2018\\
appliedphysics@annualmeetings.net\\
appliedphysics@meetingseries.org
\medskip

\medskip

we will present our results while 11:00-12:00, October 23 and we will accept all the related questions and comments while 13:00-15:00 around.

For the details, please see the below:
\medskip


(If a person participates in our session around the morning and afternoon free discussions, he should pay euro 250. If the person registers in a group of 5 or more, the amount will be reduced to euro 180 per person. The morning session is very valuable and has the potential to bring change in the education system.
For one night stay on 22nd October, he needs to pay euro 150.
I hope everything is clear.
Kindly let me know if any query.
Thanks!
Regards,
John)

}
\bigskip

\bigskip

{\Huge \bf

Close the mysterious and long history of division by zero and \\ open the new world since Aristoteles-Euclid: $1/0=0/0=z/0= \tan (\pi/2)=0.$
}
\bigskip

\bigskip

{\large \bf
For a triangle ABC with side length $a,b,c$.
We have the formula
$$
\frac{a^2 + b^2 - c^2}{a^2 - b^2 + c^2} = \frac{\tan B}{\tan C}.
$$
If $ a^2 + b^2 - c^2 =0$, then $C = \pi/2$. Then,
$$
0 =  \frac{\tan B}{\tan \frac{\pi}{2}} = \frac{\tan B}{0}.
$$
Meanwhile, for the case
$
a^2 - b^2 + c^2 =0,
$
then $B = \pi/2$, and we have
$$
\frac{a^2 + b^2 - c^2}{0}= \frac{\tan \frac{\pi}{2}}{\tan C}=0.
$$



\end{document}

再生核研究所声明 427(2018.5.8): 神の数式、神の意志 そしてゼロ除算

ドキュメンタリー 2017: 神の数式 第2回 宇宙はなぜ生まれたのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQld9cnDli4
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第3回 宇宙はなぜ始まったのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvyAB8yTSjs&t=3318s
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第1回 この世は何からできているのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjvFdzhn7Dc
NHKスペシャル 神の数式 完全版 第4回 異次元宇宙は存在するか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWVv9puoTSs 
NHKスペシャル 神の数式番組を繰り返し拝見して感銘を受けている。素晴らしい映像ばかりではなく、内容の的確さ、正確さに、ただただ驚嘆している。素晴らしい。
ある物理学の本質的な流れを理解し易く表現していて、物理学の着実な発展が良く分かる。
原爆を作ったり、素粒子を追求していたり、宇宙の生成を研究したり、物理学者はまるで、現代の神官のように感じられる。素粒子の世界と宇宙を記述するアインシュタインの方程式を融合させるなど、正に神の数式と呼ぶにふさわしいものと考えられる。流れを拝見すると物理学は適切な方向で着実に進化していると感じられる。神の数式に近づいているのに 野蛮なことを繰り返している国際政治社会には残念な気持ちが湧いて来る。ロシアの天才物理学者の終末などあまりにも酷いのではないだろうか。世界史の進化を願わざるを得ない。
アインシュタインの相対性理論は世界観の変更をもたらしたが、それに比べられるオイラーの公式は数学全般に大きな変革をもたらした: 

With this estimation, we stated that the Euler formula
$$
e^{\pi i} = -1
$$
is the best result in mathematics in details in: No.81, May 2012 (pdf 432kb)
余りにも神秘的な数式のために、アインシュタインの公式 E= mc^2 と並べて考えられる 神の意志 が感じられるだろう。 ところで、素粒子を記述する方程式とアインシュタインの方程式を融合したら、 至る所に1/0 が現れて 至る所無限大が現れて計算できないと繰り返して述べられている。しかしながら、数学は既に進化して、1/0=0 で無限大は 実はゼロだった。 驚嘆すべき世界が現れた。しかしながら、数学でも依然として、rがゼロに近づくと 無限大に発散する事実が有るので、弦の理論は否定できず、問題が存在する。さらに、形式的に発散している場合でも、ゼロ除算算法で、有限値を与え、特異点でも微分方程式を満たすという新しい概念が現れ、局面が拓かれたので、数学者ばかりではなく、物理学者の注意を喚起して置きたい。
物理学者は、素粒子の世界と巨大宇宙空間の方程式を融合させて神の方程式を目指して研究を進めている。数学者はユークリッド以来現れたゼロ除算1/0と空間の新しい構造の中から、神の意志を追求して 新しい世界の究明に乗り出して欲しいと願っている。いみじくもゼロ除算は、ゼロと無限大の関係を述べていて、素粒子と宇宙論の類似を思わせる。
人の生きるは、真智への愛にある、すなわち、事実を知りたい、本当のことを知りたい、高級に言えば 神の意志 を知りたいということである。 そこで、我々のゼロ除算についての考えは真実か否か、広く内外の関係者に意見を求めている。関係情報はどんどん公開している。 ゼロ除算の研究状況は、
数学基礎学力研究会 サイトで解説が続けられている:http://www.mirun.sctv.jp/~suugaku/
また、ohttp://okmr.yamatoblog.net/ に 関連情報がある。
以 上
ゼロ除算の論文が2編、出版になりました:

ICDDEA: International Conference on Differential & Difference Equations and Applications
Differential and Difference Equations with Applications
ICDDEA, Amadora, Portugal, June 2017
• Editors

• (view affiliations)
• Sandra Pinelas
• Tomás Caraballo
• Peter Kloeden
• John R. Graef
Conference proceedingsICDDEA 2017

log0=log∞=0log⁡0=log⁡∞=0 and Applications
Hiroshi Michiwaki, Tsutomu Matuura, Saburou Saitoh
Pages 293-305

Division by Zero Calculus and Differential Equations
Sandra Pinelas, Saburou Saitoh
Pages 399-418
とても興味深くみました: ゼロ除算(division by zero)1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0 2018年05月28日(月) テーマ:数学 これは最も簡単な 典型的なゼロ除算の結果と言えます。  ユークリッド以来の驚嘆する、誰にも分る結果では ないでしょうか? Hiroshi O. Is It Really Impossible To Divide By Zero?. Biostat Biometrics Open Acc J. 2018; 7(1): 555703. DOI: 10.19080/BBOJ.2018.07.555703 ゼロで分裂するのは本当に不可能ですか? - Juniper Publishers ↓↓↓ https://juniperpublishers.com/bboaj/pdf/BBOAJ.MS.ID.555703.pdf ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した:日本、再生核研究所   2014年2月2日

ダ・ヴィンチの名言 格言|無こそ最も素晴らしい存在
                     


ゼロ除算の発見はどうでしょうか:
Black holes are where God divided by zero:

再生核研究所声明371(2017.6.27)ゼロ除算の講演― 国際会議 
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12287338180.html

1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12276045402.html
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12263708422.html
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12272721615.html
Division By Zero(ゼロ除算)1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
ゼロ除算(ゼロじょざん、division by zero)1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

ソクラテス・プラトン・アリストテレス その他
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12328488611.html

ドキュメンタリー 2017: 神の数式 第2回 宇宙はなぜ生まれたのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQld9cnDli4
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第3回 宇宙はなぜ始まったのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvyAB8yTSjs&t=3318s
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第1回 この世は何からできているのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjvFdzhn7Dc
NHKスペシャル 神の数式 完全版 第4回 異次元宇宙は存在するか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWVv9puoTSs

再生核研究所声明 411(2018.02.02):  ゼロ除算発見4周年を迎えて
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12348847166.html

再生核研究所声明 416(2018.2.20):  ゼロ除算をやってどういう意味が有りますか。何か意味が有りますか。何になるのですか - 回答
再生核研究所声明 417(2018.2.23):  ゼロ除算って何ですか - 中学生、高校生向き 回答
再生核研究所声明 418(2018.2.24):  割り算とは何ですか? ゼロ除算って何ですか - 小学生、中学生向き 回答
再生核研究所声明 420(2018.3.2): ゼロ除算は正しいですか,合っていますか、信用できますか - 回答

2018.3.18.午前中 最後の講演: 日本数学会 東大駒場、函数方程式論分科会 講演書画カメラ用 原稿
The Japanese Mathematical Society, Annual Meeting at the University of Tokyo. 2018.3.18.
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12361744016.html より
918日(火) 14:1015:00
和算とゼロ除算
齋藤三郎・奥村 
京都大学数理解析研究所 111 号室
(講演精神・要旨)

https://note.mu/ysaitoh/n/n1d38a681644f


再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29):  レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算
再生核研究所声明 427(2018.5.8): 神の数式、神の意志 そしてゼロ除算

Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.
私は数学を信じない。 アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don't believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。
1423793753.460.341866474681。                            

Einstein's Only Mistake: Division by Zero


0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿