暴走族の元総長に女子が出待ち？ グラドルもハマる若手落語家人気とは
2016年6月18日 6時0分 週プレNEWS
寄席に通い詰め、自ら小噺を創作しているというHカップグラドル・川奈ゆうちゃん！
写真拡大
高座も観客も老人ばかり――そんなイメージもあった落語で、噺家（はなしか）もファンにも“若返り”が起きているという。
■観客席に増える若者＆女性
「最近、意外と若いお客さんも多いですよ。平日に行っても混んでますし、ひとりの女性やカップルで来てる方とかいます。昔よりはだいぶ、ＴＶとかにも落語家さん出てきたりとかニュースで取り上げられたりしているので興味のある人が増えたんじゃないですかね」
というのは、グラビアアイドルの川奈ゆうだ。５年前にファンにもらった落語ＣＤを聞いて以来、落語にハマり、時間があれば寄席（よせ）に通っているという落語好きだ。
確かに近年、“落語ブーム”と言われて久しい。２００５年に宮藤官九郎脚本・長瀬智也主演でドラマ化された『タイガー＆ドラゴン』や２００７年の国分太一主演映画『しゃべれどもしゃべれども』あたりから火が付き、大泉洋が売れない落語家役を務めた『トワイライト ささらさや』（２０１４年）、松山ケンイチが主演を務めた『の・ようなもの のようなもの』（２０１６年）と最近も落語を題材にした映画がヒット。漫画『昭和元禄落語心中』も今年、アニメ化され、話題となった。
「『行ってみたいんだけど、ひとりで行けない、行きづらい』という友達も少なくないですね。『行きたいから連れてって』といわれて一緒に行ったりしますよ。知り合いのアイドルのコでも好きなコがいて、今度行こうという話をしたりしています」（川奈）
映画やアニメなど普段、落語を観ない層からファンが増える一方、落語界もブームに乗って変わってきている。特に注目を集めているのが、若手の台頭だ。
２０１４年にスタートした、落語に造詣（ぞうけい）の深いお笑い芸人・サンキュータツオが主催する、若手落語家が中心となった「渋谷らくご」（通称：シブラク）は連日満員。
さらに『平成２７年度 ＮＨＫ新人落語大賞』を獲った柳亭小痴楽（りゅうていこちらく）と瀧川鯉八（こいはち）などが結成した若手落語家ユニット『成金』の公演も満員御礼が続いている。
「今はＳＮＳもありますし、若手落語家自ら発信する機会も増えました。そうしたところから各々アピールして認知され始めていると思います。特に昔と違って、今は元お笑い芸人出身だったり前職のある若手も多く、キャラクターに富んでいるので面白いんですよ」
そう話すのは、演芸情報誌『東京かわら版』の佐藤友美編集長。「落語」という芸だけでなく、その魅力的な人間性でファンを増やしているとのことだ。
また、若手落語家の人気に拍車をかけているのが、“イケメン”の存在。先月発売された雑誌『ＡＥＲＡ ＳＴＹＬＥ ＭＡＧＡＺＩＮＥ Ｖｏｌ．３１』では、あまりの人気にチケットの入手も困難な春風亭一之輔など、イケメン落語家にフォーカスした特集を組んだことで反響を呼んだ。
また、２月に放送されたＮＨＫの『あさイチ』でも柳亭市弥（りゅうていいちや）らがイケメン落語家として紹介されるなど、落語界にもイケメンブームが起きているのだ。
もちろん、彼らも顔だけではない。落語協会理事である柳家喬太郎（きょうたろう）など渋めの落語家が好きだという川奈もイケメン落語家のひとり、瀧川鯉斗（こいと）が気になるという。
「寄席に行くと、若い女性が出待ち、入り待ちなども普通にしてますね。私も鯉斗さんには興味あるんですよ。お顔も整っているんですけど、暴走族の元総長なのに『お話はすごく端正』だって友達に聞いて、そのギャップがたまらないらしいんです。まだ聴いたことないので聴いてみたいなって」
とはいえ、触れたことのない人にはハードルの高い落語。ここまで若い人々も魅了する理由はなんなのか。
「何も考えないで笑いたいとか、楽しい気分になりたいとかいう時に行くと、笑わせてもらえるので。何も考えず、とりあえず自分が行けば座ってて笑って楽しいみたいな。上手な方だと本当に女性に見えたりとか、子供みたいな仕草とか身振り手振りがリアルですごいので、そういうのを観ているだけでも面白いと思います」（川奈）
■川奈ゆう（ＫＡＷＡＮＡ ＹＵ）
１９８４年７月３日生まれ 東京都出身 Ｂ９４ Ｗ５９ Ｈ８６
グラビア歴１２年、ミス東スポ２０１５特別賞に輝いたグラビアアイドル。その豊満なバストは最近、ＧカップからＨカップに成長！ 自らネタ帳に小噺を書き溜め、舞台の幕間に披露するなど、落語にハマった“落語女子”。近況はＴｗｉｔｔｅｒにて @kawanayu198473
■東京かわら版 創刊４０年を越える老舗であり、日本で唯一の演芸専門誌。都内を中心に毎月１千件を超える落語・講談・浪曲など寄席演芸情報を掲載。落語好きにとってのバイブル。演芸界史上初、東西の落語家・講談師など１１００名近くが掲載された『東西寄席演芸家名鑑』も発売中 http://www.tokyo-kawaraban.net/
（取材／文 鯨井隆正 撮影／五十嵐和博）http://news.livedoor.com/article/detail/11656428/
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\title{\bf Announcement 300: New challenges on the division by zero z/0=0\\
(2016.05.22)}
\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\
Kawauchi-cho, 5-1648-16,\\
Kiryu 376-0041, Japan\\
%\date{\today}
\maketitle
{\bf Abstract: } In this announcement, for its importance we would like to state the
situation on the division by zero and propose basic new challenges.
\bigskip
\section{Introduction}
%\label{sect1}
By a {\bf natural extension} of the fractions
\begin{equation}
\frac{b}{a}
\end{equation}
for any complex numbers $a$ and $b$, we found the simple and beautiful result, for any complex number $b$
\begin{equation}
\frac{b}{0}=0,
\end{equation}
incidentally in \cite{s} by the Tikhonov regularization for the Hadamard product inversions for matrices and we discussed their properties and gave several physical interpretations on the general fractions in \cite{kmsy} for the case of real numbers.
The division by zero has a long and mysterious story over the world (see, for example, Google site with the division by zero) with its physical viewpoints since the document of zero in India on AD 628, however,
Sin-Ei Takahasi (\cite{kmsy}) established a simple and decisive interpretation (1.2) by analyzing the extensions of fractions and by showing the complete characterization for the property (1.2):
\bigskip
{\bf Proposition 1. }{\it Let F be a function from ${\bf C }\times {\bf C }$ to ${\bf C }$ satisfying
$$
F (b, a)F (c, d)= F (bc, ad)
$$
for all
$$
a, b, c, d \in {\bf C }
$$
and
$$
F (b, a) = \frac {b}{a }, \quad a, b \in {\bf C }, a \ne 0.
$$
Then, we obtain, for any $b \in {\bf C } $
$$
F (b, 0) = 0.
$$
}
Note that the complete proof of this proposition is simply given by 2 or 3 lines.
\medskip
We thus should consider, for any complex number $b$, as (1.2);
that is, for the mapping
\begin{equation}
w = \frac{1}{z},
\end{equation}
the image of $z=0$ is $w=0$ ({\bf should be defined}). This fact seems to be a curious one in connection with our well-established popular image for the point at infinity on the Riemann sphere. Therefore, the division by zero will give great impacts to complex analysis and to our ideas for the space and universe.
However, the division by zero (1.2) is now clear, indeed, for the introduction of (1.2), we have several independent approaches as in:
\medskip
1) by the generalization of the fractions by the Tikhonov regularization or by the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse,
\medskip
2) by the intuitive meaning of the fractions (division) by H. Michiwaki,
\medskip
3) by the unique extension of the fractions by S. Takahasi, as in the above,
\medskip
4) by the extension of the fundamental function $W = 1/z$ from ${\bf C} \setminus \{0\}$ into ${\bf C}$ such that $W =1/z$ is a one to one and onto mapping from $ {\bf C} \setminus \{0\} $ onto ${\bf C} \setminus \{0\}$ and the division by zero $1/0=0$ is a one to one and onto mapping extension of the function $W =1/z $ from ${\bf C}$ onto ${\bf C}$,
\medskip
and
\medskip
5) by considering the values of functions with the mean values of functions.
\medskip
Furthermore, in (\cite{msy}) we gave the results in order to show the reality of the division by zero in our world:
\medskip
\medskip
A) a field structure containing the division by zero --- the Yamada field ${\bf Y}$,
\medskip
B) by the gradient of the $y$ axis on the $(x,y)$ plane --- $\tan \frac{\pi}{2} =0$,
\medskip
C) by the reflection $W =1/\overline{z}$ of $W= z$ with respect to the unit circle with center at the origin on the complex $z$ plane --- the reflection point of zero is zero,
\medskip
and
\medskip
D) by considering rotation of a right circular cone having some very interesting
phenomenon from some practical and physical problem.
\medskip
In (\cite{mos}), many division by zero results in Euclidean spaces are given and the basic idea at the point at infinity should be changed. In (\cite{ms}), we gave beautiful geometrical interpretations of determinants from the viewpoint of the division by zero. The results show that the division by zero is our basic and elementary mathematics in our world.
\medskip
See J. A. Bergstra, Y. Hirshfeld and J. V. Tucker \cite{bht} for the relationship between fields and the division by zero, and the importance of the division by zero for computer science. It seems that the relationship of the division by zero and field structures are abstract in their paper.
Meanwhile, J. P. Barukcic and I. Barukcic (\cite{bb}) discussed recently the relation between the divisions $0/0$, $1/0$ and special relative theory of Einstein. However, their logic seems to be curious and their results contradict with ours.
Furthermore, T. S. Reis and J.A.D.W. Anderson (\cite{ra,ra2}) extend the system of the real numbers by introducing an ideal number for the division by zero $0/0$.
Meanwhile, we should refer to up-to-date information:
{\it Riemann Hypothesis Addendum - Breakthrough
Kurt Arbenz
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272022137 Riemann Hypothesis Addendum - Breakthrough.}
\medskip
Here, we recall Albert Einstein's words on mathematics:
Blackholes are where God divided by zero.
I don't believe in mathematics.
George Gamow (1904-1968) Russian-born American nuclear physicist and cosmologist remarked that "it is well known to students of high school algebra" that division by zero is not valid; and Einstein admitted it as {\bf the biggest blunder of his life} [1]：
1. Gamow, G., My World Line (Viking, New York). p 44, 1970.
For our ideas on the division by zero, see the survey style announcements 179,185,237,246,247,250 and 252 of the Institute of Reproducing Kernels (\cite{ann179,ann185,ann237,ann246,ann247,ann250,ann252,ann293}).
\section{On mathematics}
Apparently, the division by zero is a great missing in our mathematics and the result (1.2) is definitely determined as our basic mathematics, as we see from Proposition 1. Note its very general assumptions and many fundamental evidences in our world in (\cite{kmsy,msy,mos}). The results will give great impacts on Euclidean spaces, analytic geometry, calculus, differential equations, complex analysis and physical problems. See our announcements for the details.
The mysterious history of the division by zero over one thousand years is a great shame of mathematicians and human race on the world history, like the Ptolemaic system (geocentric theory). The division by zero will become a typical symbol of foolish human race with long and unceasing struggles. Future people will realize this fact as a definite common sense.
We should check and fill our mathematics, globally and beautifully, from the viewpoint of the division by zero. Our mathematics will be more perfect and beautiful, and will give great impacts to our basic ideas on the universe.
\section{Albert Einstein's biggest blunder}
The division by zero is directly related to the Einstein's theory and various
physical problems
containing the division by zero. Now we should check the theory and the problems by the concept of the RIGHT and DEFINITE division by zero. Now is the best time since 100 years from Albert Einstein. It seems that the background knowledge is timely fruitful.
\section{Computer systems}
The above Professors listed are wishing the contributions in order to avoid the zero division trouble in computers. Now, we should arrange new computer systems in order not to meet the division by zero trouble in computer systems.
\section{General ideas on the universe}
The division by zero may be related to religion, philosophy and the ideas on the universe, and it will creat a new world. Look the new world.
\bigskip
We are standing on a new generation and in front of the new world, as in the discovery of the Americas.
\bigskip
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{bb}
J. P. Barukcic and I. Barukcic, Anti Aristotle—The Division of Zero by Zero. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, {\bf 4}(2016), 749-761.
doi: 10.4236/jamp.2016.44085.
\bibitem{bht}
J. A. Bergstra, Y. Hirshfeld and J. V. Tucker,
Meadows and the equational specification of division (arXiv:0901.0823v1[math.RA] 7 Jan 2009).
\bibitem{cs}
L. P. Castro and S. Saitoh, Fractional functions and their representations, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory {\bf7} (2013), no. 4, 1049-1063.
\bibitem{kmsy}
M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,
New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$,
Int. J. Appl. Math. {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198, DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.
\bibitem{ms}
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Matrices and division by zero $z/0=0$,
Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory (ALAMT)(to appear).
\bibitem{msy}
H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M.Yamada,
Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$. IJAPM International J. of Applied Physics and Math. {\bf 6}(2015), 1--8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html
\bibitem{mos}
H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura, and S. Saitoh,
Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces.
International Journal of Mathematics and Computation
(in press).
\bibitem{ra}
T. S. Reis and J.A.D.W. Anderson,
Transdifferential and Transintegral Calculus,
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2014 Vol I
WCECS 2014, 22-24 October, 2014, San Francisco, USA
\bibitem{ra2}
T. S. Reis and J.A.D.W. Anderson,
Transreal Calculus,
IAENG International J. of Applied Math., {\bf 45}(2015): IJAM 45 1 06.
\bibitem{s}
S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices, Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory. {\bf 4} (2014), no. 2, 87--95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/
\bibitem{ttk}
S.-E. Takahasi, M. Tsukada and Y. Kobayashi, Classification of continuous fractional binary operations on the real and complex fields, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics, {\bf 38}(2015), no. 2, 369-380.
\bibitem{ann179}
Announcement 179 (2014.8.30): Division by zero is clear as z/0=0 and it is fundamental in mathematics.
\bibitem{ann185}
Announcement 185 (2014.10.22): The importance of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann237}
Announcement 237 (2015.6.18): A reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$ by geometrical optics.
\bibitem{ann246}
Announcement 246 (2015.9.17): An interpretation of the division by zero $1/0=0$ by the gradients of lines.
\bibitem{ann247}
Announcement 247 (2015.9.22): The gradient of y-axis is zero and $\tan (\pi/2) =0$ by the division by zero $1/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann250}
Announcement 250 (2015.10.20): What are numbers? - the Yamada field containing the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann252}
Announcement 252 (2015.11.1): Circles and
curvature - an interpretation by Mr.
Hiroshi Michiwaki of the division by
zero $r/0 = 0$.
\bibitem{ann281}
Announcement 281(2016.2.1): The importance of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann282}
Announcement 282(2016.2.2): The Division by Zero $z/0=0$ on the Second Birthday.
\bibitem{ann293}
Announcement 293(2016.3.27): Parallel lines on the Euclidean plane from the viewpoint of division by zero 1/0=0.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿