EFE Violates the Basic of Astronomy

Gatot Soedart　Aug 12, 2017

Riemann’s ambition was nothing less than a total theory of physics, including electricity, magnetism, gravity and light, based on a single mathematical law. In this case Riemann had failed. Riemann’s ambition was forwarded by Einstein; and Einstein had also failed to find the Unified Field Theory.

“The other gateway to this knowledge may be opened by the Unified Field Theory upon which Einstein has been work for a quarter century” (Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr.Einstein).

The Einstein Field Equations say:

**Curvature of spacetime = density and flux of energy and momentum.**

The left-hand side of that equation is a matrix of numbers (curvature of spacetime). Mathematically, spacetime is a manifold. The right-hand side is a matrix of quantum operators, each of which has an expectation value. This, at some level, makes no sense.

Mathematically, spacetime is a manifold. But, there is no manifold in the basic of astronomy. Albert Einstein really had no idea on the basic of astronomy. It’s like a people have no experience in electronics, then try to modify a sound system, of course, the resulting sound is becoming discordant.

Mathematics actually is about a way of modeling patterns that we see in the real world. It is similar with thought experiment, a mathemathic equation can be made to obtain the result they wanted to get.

Is the mathematic true and then the theory should be true? No, for example, according to Maxwell’s equations, it’s possible to have a “magnetic monopole” — a magnet with a North pole but no South pole. Magnetic monopoles have never been discovered, and many scientists believe they don’t really exist.

“It is impossible to make magnetic monopoles from a bar magnet. If a bar magnet is cut in half, it is not the case that one half has the north pole and the other half has the south pole. Instead, each piece has its own north and south poles. A magnetic monopole cannot be created from normal matter such as atoms and electrons, but would instead be a new elementary particle.”

Magnetic monopole - Wikipedia
A magnetic monopole is a hypothetical elementary particle in particle physics that is an isolated magnet with only one…en.wikipedia.org

If you study Einstein Field Equation of gravitation, you’ll find EFE is based on assumptions, thought experiment, and Riemann geometry. In the case of Einstein’s thought experiments, we know that there are full of logical fallacies; a kind of a false equivalence and the fallacy of composition.

Riemann Geometry

One of the basic topics in Riemannian geometry is the study of curved surfaces in general. Riemann geometry also study higher dimensional spaces. But, there are no practical applications of Riemann geometry in astronomy. Riemann did not take an interest in the space of the astronomers. Questions about the global properties of space he cut short as “idle questions.”

Projecting a sphere to a plane is very important to make a map used in astronomy. But, the astronomy doesn’t using Riemann geometry.

Einstein was interested to Riemann geometry, but Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy, therefore, he had not realized that Riemann geometry is useless in astronomy. Ironically, he declared a mathematical equations (EFE) that are based on Riemann. So, EFE is also useless in astronomy, in the sense that EFE violate of astronomy.

In order not to force the reader constantly to consult the previous publications, I repeat here the considerations in their entirety. One derives from the well-known Riemann-covariant of rank four the following (The Field Equation of Gravitation)

To get his equation, among other Einstein assumes that ‘in spaces where matter is absent’; this assumption is reasonless to reality. Outer space, or just space, is the void that exists between celestial bodies, including Earth. It is not completely empty, but consists of a hard vacuum containing a low density of particles, predominantly a plasma of hydrogen and helium as well as electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, neutrinos, dust, and cosmic rays.

He also doesn’t understand that space around the massive bodies is not empty vacuum, but the atmospheric medium. EFE had ignored the atmospheric medium. That’s why the Gravity Probe B went wrong tries to detect the geodetic effect and the frame-dragging effect in the Earth’s atmosphere. That is something illogical and impossible.

Mathematically, spacetime is a manifold, which is to say, it appears locally “flat” near each point in the same way that, at small enough scales, a globe appears flat. An extremely large scale factor, relates distances measured in space with distances measured in time. The magnitude of this scale factor (nearly 300,000 km in space being equivalent to 1 second in time), along with the fact that spacetime is a manifold, implies that at ordinary, non-relativistic speeds and at ordinary, human-scale distances, there is little that humans might observe which is noticeably different from what they might observe if the world were Euclidean.

Beside that, Einstein concluded that gravity and acceleration must produce the curvature of space for this mathematical theory.The elements of EFE are called “tensors”. These tensors must have precise mathematical characteristics, so that they transform into different coordinates according to the rigid rules of the Riemann-Ricci mathematical theory. Tensors that satisfy this requirement are called true tensors.

He called this true tensor his “energy-momentum tensor”. He also tried to develop a true tensor to specify the energy of the gravitational field, but he could only achieve a “pseudo-tensor”, which could not be used in his gravitational field equation. The Einstein equation actually cannot yield meaningful predictions of the much larger relativistic effects associated with cosmology, because the Einstein gravitational field equation lacks a true tensor to characterize the gravitational field.

There is no manifold in the basic of astronomy.

What is a manifold? A manifold is a topological space that locally resembles Euclidean space near each point. More precisely, each point of an n-dimensional manifold has a neighbourhood that is homeomorphic to the Euclidean space of dimension n. In this more precise terminology, a manifold is referred to as an n-manifold.

One-dimensional manifolds include lines and circles, but not figure eights (because they have crossing points that are not locally homeomorphic to Euclidean 1-space). Two-dimensional manifolds are also called surfaces. Examples include the plane, the sphere, and the torus, which can all be embedded (formed without self-intersections) in three dimensional real space, but also the Klein bottle and real projective plane, which will always self-intersect when immersed in three-dimensional real space.

**The** **real projective plane** **is a two-dimensional manifold that cannot be realized in three dimensions without self-intersection, shown here as** **Boy’s surface**.

The concept of a manifold is central to many parts of geometry and modern mathematical physics because it allows complicated structures to be described and understood in terms of the simpler local topological properties of Euclidean space. Manifolds naturally arise as solution sets of systems of equations and as graphs of functions. (Manifold)

Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation in Relativity Theory

Mathematical procedure by which Albert Einstein derived Lorentz transformation is incorrect. The transformation is an imaginary “solution” to a set of equations which evaluate to zero throughout the derivation process.Author derives Lorentz transformation the way Einstein did, and shows the places where errors were made.

Explanations of Errors
Error 1 →Expression (3) is useless. We have

x − ct = 0 (1)
x’− ct’ = 0 (2)

In (3) Einstein writes

x’ − ct’ = a ( x − ct ) (3) -(a = lambda symbol)

Because of (1) and (2) we can write (3) as
0 = a0

One can postulate that meaningful values, which are at least sometimes both different from zero, are somehow related. Introducing proportionality quotient between nothing and nothing has no meaning. Read more in masstheory-lorentz.

Division only makes sense when the number you are dividing by is non-zero.Therefore, it is not legitimate to divide both sides of the equation because that would be division by zero, which does not make any sense.

That is the same as saying “3 times 0 equals 7 times 0, therefore 3 equals 7”. The fallacy is that, just because two numbers give you the same answer (zero) after you multiply them each by zero, doesn’t necessarily mean that the two numbers are the same, because anything when multiplied by zero gives zero.

How Einstein was Wrong about E=MC2

Einstein made three basic mistakes in his interpretation of the E=MC2 equation. Einstein’s first mistake with E=MC2 was to take a simple equation and then try to interpret it with two contradictory and paradoxical ideas of mass and energy.

The Antisymmetric Connection: Fundamental Errors in the Einstein Field Equation

It is shown that there are several irretrievable errors in the Einstein theory of cosmology used in the standard model, and in all derivative theories thereof. The root cause of these errors is that Einstein’s theory used a connection in Riemann geometry that is symmetric in its lower two indices. The connection must however be antisymmetric in its lower two indices as shown in previous papers of this series ( www.aias.us). The incorrect use of a symmetric connection means that the general relativity of the last ninety years or so is incorrect and should be developed with Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) theory. All the major assumptions of Einsteinian cosmology are based on an assumed symmetric connection, notably the second Bianchi identity used in the field equation, and the geodesic method used by Einstein in deriving the Newtonian limit. Derivative theories such as the Hawking-Penrose singularity theorems also assume a symmetric connection, and are therefore mathematically incorrect and physically meaningless. All metrics of the Einstein field equation are incorrect. An error free cosmology based on ECE theory has been developed in earlier papers of this series.(The Antisymmetric Connection).

Now I know why everyone says Einstein is so difficult to understand. It’s because he performed impossible and paradoxical mathematical operations:

Mathematical nonsense as used by Einstein’s relativity: Mathematical nonsense

Feynman said :“It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong”

Actually, Feynman tells us about the beautiful of Einstein general theory of relativity, but it doesn’t agree with 1919 eclipse experiment, so it’s wrong.

“Imagination is more important than knowledge” (Albert Einstein)

Unfortunately, Einstein’s imagination lead him to the biggest blunder in modern physics for more than 100 years.

Former NASA physicist Dr. Edward Dowdye Jr disputes Einstein’s relativity theory. “I believe if Einstein were alive today, he would take advantage of the modern techniques and the modern instruments we have and he would wind up disproving his own theory,” said Dr. Dowdye, a physicist and laser optics engineer who retired from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. He is an independent researcher and founder of Pure Classical Physics Research and he is a member of The American Physics Society.

Conclusion

The field equations of gravitation (EFE) violates the basic of modern astronomy

Einstein’s general relativity has never been right. Einstein has no idea on the basic of astronomy. Einstein hypothesis and Einstein proposed test about bending of light is closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. The navigators around the world will easily able to know Einstein’s hypothesis is not valid; and doesn’t meet requirement of the scientific method.

If you don’t understand Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy and Einstein’s hypothesis is not valid; physics training is needed, but more importantly is celestial navigation training. Or, you should look for a person who expert on astronomy/celestial navigation to explain the meaning of Einstein’s hypothesis and test via solar eclipse as written in the book ‘The Universe and Dr.Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, Foreword by Albert Einstein himself, on page 78.

They did not hesitate to say: “One century after its formulation, Einstein’s general relativity has made remarkable predictions and turned out to be compatible with all experimental tests.”; or said that special and general theory of relativity are incredibly well tested and very accurate theories. But, actually, all tests are the case of ‘knowing the result’. Obviously, nonsense. General relativity is the greatest hoax in science of 20th century.

Until now, for more than 90 years, Nobel Committe statements in the year 1921 is still valid:”Without taking into account the value that will be accorded your relativity and gravitation theories after these are confirmed in the future”.

To many, and to Einstein himself, this felt like a slap in the face.

The next generation of scientists must know that Einstein’s theory is wrong. If they accepted Einstein’s relativity, I’m sure that their reputation and their college degree will be useless.

Here you’ll find my thoughts on writing and links to my published works: Medium, Twitter, Amazon, Quora. Read story about Science, Military, and Religion: My Blog and care on Health and Safety in this blog: Princess Mandalika. Thank you!

https://medium.com/@GatotSoedarto/the-field-equations-of-gravitation-efe-violate-the-basic-of-astronomy-b0075a715de6

とても興味深く読みました

ゼロ除算の発見は日本です：

∞？？？

∞は定まった数ではない・・・・

人工知能はゼロ除算ができるでしょうか：

5年　　ゼロ除算の発見と重要性をした：再生核研究所　　2014年2月2日

God’s most important commandment
never-divide-by-zero-meme-66

Even more important than “thou shalt not eat seafood”
Published by admin, on October 18th, 2011 at 3:47 pm. Filled under: Never Divide By Zero Tags: commandment, Funny, god, zero • Comments Off on God’s most important commandment
http://thedistractionnetwork.com/.../never-divide.../page/4/

1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12276045402.html
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12263708422.html
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12272721615.html
Division By Zero（ゼロ除算）1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12392596876.html

ゼロ除算（ゼロじょざん、division by zero）1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12394775733.html

再生核研究所声明371（2017.6.27）ゼロ除算の講演―　国際会議　https://sites.google.com/site/sandrapinelas/icddea-2017　報告

ソクラテス・プラトン・アリストテレス　その他
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12328488611.html

Ten billion years ago　DIVISION By ZERO：
https://www.facebook.com/notes/yoshinori-saito/ten-billion-years-ago-division-by-zero/1930645683923690/

One hundred million years ago　DIVISION By ZERO
https://www.facebook.com/.../one-hundred-million-years-ago

https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12370907279.html

ダ・ヴィンチの名言 格言｜無こそ最も素晴らしい存在

https://systemincome.com/7521

ゼロ除算の発見はどうでしょうか：
Black holes are where God divided by zero：

再生核研究所声明371（2017.6.27）ゼロ除算の講演―　国際会議　
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12287338180.html

1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12276045402.html
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12263708422.html
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
http://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12272721615.html
Division By Zero（ゼロ除算）1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12392596876.html

ゼロ除算（ゼロじょざん、division by zero）1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12394775733.html

ソクラテス・プラトン・アリストテレス　その他
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12328488611.html

ドキュメンタリー 2017: 神の数式第２回宇宙はなぜ生まれたのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQld9cnDli4
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式完全版第3回宇宙はなぜ始まったのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvyAB8yTSjs&t=3318s
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式完全版第1回この世は何からできているのか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjvFdzhn7Dc
NHKスペシャル神の数式完全版第4回異次元宇宙は存在するか
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWVv9puoTSs

再生核研究所声明 411(2018.02.02): 　ゼロ除算発見4周年を迎えて
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12348847166.html

再生核研究所声明 416(2018.2.20): 　ゼロ除算をやってどういう意味が有りますか。何か意味が有りますか。何になるのですか　－　回答
再生核研究所声明 417(2018.2.23): 　ゼロ除算って何ですか　－　中学生、高校生向き　回答
再生核研究所声明 418(2018.2.24): 　割り算とは何ですか？　ゼロ除算って何ですか　－　小学生、中学生向き　回答
再生核研究所声明 420(2018.3.2): ゼロ除算は正しいですか，合っていますか、信用できますか　－　回答

2018.3.18．午前中　最後の講演：　日本数学会　東大駒場、函数方程式論分科会　講演書画カメラ用　原稿
The Japanese Mathematical Society, Annual Meeting at the University of Tokyo. 2018.3.18.
https://ameblo.jp/syoshinoris/entry-12361744016.html より

9月18日（火） 14:10～15:00

和算とゼロ除算

齋藤三郎・奥村 博

京都大学数理解析研究所 111 号室

（講演精神・要旨）

https://note.mu/ysaitoh/n/n1d38a681644f

再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29): 　レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算

再生核研究所声明 427(2018.5.8): 神の数式、神の意志　そしてゼロ除算

アインシュタインも解決できなかった「ゼロで割る」問題

http://matome.naver.jp/odai/2135710882669605901

Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.

https://notevenpast.org/dividing-nothing/

私は数学を信じない。　アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don't believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。

1423793753.460.341866474681。

Einstein's Only Mistake: Division by Zero

http://refully.blogspot.jp/2012/05/einsteins-only-mistake-division-by-zero.html

神の数式で　ゼロ除算を用いると　どうなるのでしょうか　という質問が　寄せられています。

神の数式：

神の数式が解析関数でかけて居れば、　特異点でローラン展開して、正則部の第1項を取れば、　何時でも有限値を得るので、　形式的に無限が出ても　実は問題なく　意味を有します。

物理学者如何でしょうか。

ゼロ除算、ゼロで割る問題、分からない、正しいのかなど、　良く理解できない人が　未だに　多いようです。そこで、簡潔な一般的な　解説を思い付きました。　もちろん、学会などでも述べていますが、　予断で　良く聞けないようです。まず、分数、a/b は　a 　割る b　のことで、これは　方程式 b x=a　の解のことです。ところが、　b　がゼロならば、　どんな　xでも　0 x =0　ですから、a　がゼロでなければ、解は存在せず、　従って　100/0　など、ゼロ除算は考えられない、できないとなってしまいます。　普通の意味では　ゼロ除算は　不可能であるという、世界の常識、定説です。できない、不可能であると言われれば、いろいろ考えたくなるのが、人間らしい創造の精神です。　基本方程式　b x=a　が　b　がゼロならば解けない、解が存在しないので、困るのですが、このようなとき、従来の結果が成り立つような意味で、解が考えられないかと、数学者は良く考えて来ました。　何と、　そのような方程式は　何時でも唯一つに　一般化された意味で解をもつと考える　方法があります。　Moore-Penrose　一般化逆の考え方です。　どんな行列の　逆行列を唯一つに定める　一般的な　素晴らしい、自然な考えです。その考えだと、　b　がゼロの時、解はゼロが出るので、　a/0=0　と定義するのは　当然です。　すなわち、この意味で　方程式の解を考えて　分数を考えれば、ゼロ除算は　ゼロとして定まる　ということです。ただ一つに定まるのですから、　この考えは　自然で、その意味を知りたいと　考えるのは、当然ではないでしょうか？初等数学全般に影響を与える　ユークリッド以来の新世界が　現れてきます。

ゼロ除算の誤解は深刻：

最近、3つの事が在りました。

私の簡単な講演、相当な数学者が信じられないような誤解をして、全然理解できなく、目が回っているいるような印象を受けたこと、
相当ゼロ除算の研究をされている方が、基本を誤解されていたこと、1/0　の定義を誤解されていた。
相当な才能の持ち主が、連続性や順序に拘って、４年以上もゼロ除算の研究を避けていたこと。

これらのことは、人間如何に予断と偏見にハマった存在であるかを教えている。
まずは　ゼロ除算は不可能であるの　思いが強すぎで、初めからダメ、考えない、無視の気持ちが、強い。　ゼロ除算を従来の　掛け算の逆と考えると、不可能であるが　証明されてしまうので、割り算の意味を拡張しないと、考えられない。それで、　1/0,0/0,z/0　などの意味を発見する必要がある。　それらの意味は、普通の意味ではないことの　初めの考えを飛ばして　ダメ、ダメの感情が　突っ走ている。　非ユークリッド幾何学の出現や天動説が地動説に変わった世界史の事件のような　形相と言える。

２０１８．９．２２．６：４１
ゼロ除算の４つの誤解：

１．ゼロでは割れない、ゼロ除算は　不可能である　との考え方に拘って、思考停止している。　普通、不可能であるは、考え方や意味を拡張して　可能にできないかと考えるのが　数学の伝統であるが、それができない。

２．可能にする考え方が　紹介されても　ゼロ除算の意味を誤解して、繰り返し間違えている。可能にする理論を　素直に理解しない、　強い従来の考えに縛られている。拘っている。

３．ゼロ除算を関数に適用すると　強力な不連続性を示すが、連続性のアリストテレス以来の　連続性の考えに囚われていて　強力な不連続性を受け入れられない。数学では、不連続性の概念を明確に持っているのに、不連続性の凄い現象に、ゼロ除算の場合には　理解できない。

４．深刻な誤解は、ゼロ除算は本質的に定義であり、仮定に基づいているので　疑いの気持ちがぬぐえず、ダメ、怪しいと誤解している。数学が公理系に基づいた理論体系のように、ゼロ除算は　新しい仮定に基づいていること。　定義に基づいていることの認識が良く理解できず、誤解している。

George Gamow (1904-1968) Russian-born American nuclear physicist and cosmologist remarked that "it is well known to students of high school algebra" that division by zero is not valid; and Einstein admitted it as {\bf the biggest blunder of his life} [1]：1. Gamow, G., My World Line (Viking, New York). p 44, 1970.