再生核研究所: Divided by Zero July 18, 2010frustra

Divided by Zero

July 18, 2010 frustra

To Aru Kagaku no Railgun’s Saten Ruiko was exceptional in her Saimoe debut as she topped Group Ten of the Preliminary Round of the Anime Saimoe Tournament 2010. This was Railgun’s second prelim group win, following Misaka Mikoto’s demolition of Group Two.The runner-up for Group Ten was Takei Hisa of Saki, with Working!!’s Takanashi Nazuna placing third. At fourth was Hanato Kobato, while completing the top five was Angel Beats!’s Shiina.

The rest of the qualifiers, in order, were Saki’s Kajiki Yumi and Someya Mako, Suminoe Ako of Kiss x sis, Alicia Melchiott of Senjou no Valkyria, Eve Neuschwanstein of NEEDLESS, Mikogami Riko of Anyamal Tantei Kiruminzoo, and lastly, Mahou Sensei Negima!’s Sakurazaki Setsuna.

Go here for complete results.

===

Saten did not make it close even though Hisa was leading early on. Railgun has great mojo going for it, and it appears that Saki is fading for a bit. Maybe they can turn it around come the elimination rounds, but I’m skeptical. Although it’s worth noting that these are not the strongest of what Saki has to offer. Kobato did better than expected. The rest went according to plan except for the NEEDLESS and Kiruminzoo curveballs. For picks, 8-2-0, nothing to see here, except having to support Haruka and Nami again…

Group Eleven Preview

Now for the more interesting part. I wonder how rookies Uiharu and Mayoi can match up against Saki and Yuki. The other question is how triumphant Yuki’s return will be since crashing out in one of the most famous matches in Saimoe history back in 2006. Can she do a Nanoha? That remains to be seen. Rena is also here, and she has some stuff to take home, but her glory days back when she took Kagami home have long gone. Koume will likely make it. Giving Ange a vote of confidence here, but I have my doubts. At the very least she’ll make it… I think. Amu did well last year, but I doubt that will repeat in this tournament. Filled the rest of the prediction with Saimoe veterans. I’m worried with Tamaki, but TYM can do decent I think. In the end, I went with this:

Nagato Yuki
Miyanaga Saki
Uiharu Kazari
Hachikuji Mayoi
Rena Ryuugu
Hinamori Amu
Koume
Ishigaki Tamaki
Ushiromiya Ange
Lala Satalin Deviluke
Yoshinoya-sensei
Konoe Konoka

As for picks, this was pretty tough, but I’m opting for:

Amu – cool and spicy is the way to go, and at one point she was very high in my moe list.
Tamaki – Kawazoe she is not, but Hirohashi Ryou, and that attitude makes me put her in my ballot
Uiharu – now that Saten’s there, she needs to make it too!
Koume – the underrated Hanamaru girl, she still has my support nonetheless.
Yoshinoya-sensei – teachers should be more like her.
Konoka – Nonaka Ai. Secchan. Healing magic. Fuck yeah.
Sakazaki Kaho – one of the more interesting characters in Yoku Wakaru Gendai Mahou
Satsukitane Mikako – trollsome. Ayahime. My favorite SnO chara
Tomokane – Miyukichi vote. Lively character.
Murasame Sumika – just too awesome

This is pretty much a prelude to the biggest showdown for the preliminaries. Still, I wonder how this group will pan out. Again, can’t wait for Group Twelve!https://saimoe.wordpress.com/2010/07/18/divided-by-zero/

とても興味深く読みました：

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}

\numberwithin{equation}{section}

\begin{document}

\title{\bf Announcement410 : What is mathematics? -- beyond logic; for great challengers on the division by zero\\

(2018.１.30.)}

\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\

Kawauchi-cho, 5-1648-16,\\

Kiryu 376-0041, Japan\\

}

\date{\today}

\maketitle

The Institute of Reproducing Kernels is dealing with the theory of division by zero calculus and declares that the division by zero was discovered as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$ in a natural sense on 2014.2.2. The result shows a new basic idea on the universe and space since Aristotelēs (BC384 - BC322) and Euclid (BC 3 Century - ), and the division by zero is since Brahmagupta (598 - 668 ?).

In particular, Brahmagupta defined as $0/0=0$ in Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta (628), however, our world history stated that his definition $0/0=0$ is wrong over 1300 years, but, we showed that his definition is suitable.

For the details, see the references and the site: http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/

We wrote a global book manuscript \cite{s18} with 154 pages

and stated that the division by zero is trivial and clear, and in the last section of the manuscript we stated as follows:

\bigskip

{\bf Conclusion}

\medskip

Apparently, the common sense on the division by zero with a long and mysterious history is wrong and our basic idea on the space around the point at infinity is also wrong since Euclid. On the gradient or on derivatives we have a great missing since $\tan (\pi/2) = 0$. Our mathematics is also wrong in elementary mathematics on the division by zero.

This book is an elementary mathematics on our division by zero as the first publication of books for the topics. The contents have wide connections to various fields beyond mathematics. The author expects the readers write some philosophy, papers and essays on the division by zero from this simple source book.

The division by zero theory may be developed and expanded greatly as in the author's conjecture whose break theory was recently given surprisingly and deeply by Professor Qi'an Guan \cite{guan} since 30 years proposed in \cite{s88} (the original is in \cite {s79}).

We have to arrange globally our modern mathematics with our division by zero in our undergraduate level.

We have to change our basic ideas for our space and world.

We have to change globally our textbooks and scientific books on the division by zero.

\bigskip

However, we have still curious situations and opinions for us on the division by zero; in particular, the two great challengers Jakub Czajko and Ilija Barukčić on the division by zero in connection with physics stated that we do not have the definition of the division $0/0$, however $0/0=1$.

They seem to think that a truth is based on physical objects and is not on our mathematics. In such a cases, we will not be able to continue discussions on the division by zero more, because for mathematicians, they will not be able to follow their logics more. However, then we will ask for the question that what are the values and contributions of your articles and discussions. We will expect some contributions, of course.

This question will reflect to mathematicians contrary. We stated for the estimation of mathematisc in \cite{s97}: Mathematics is the collection of relations and, good results are fundamental,

beautiful, and give

great good impacts to human beings.

With this estimation, we stated that the Euler formula

e^{\pi i} = -1

is the best result in mathematics in details in:

\medskip

No.81, May 2012(pdf 432kb)

www.jams.or.jp/kaiho/kaiho-81.pdf

\medskip

In order to show the importance of our division by zero and division by zero calculus we are requested to show their importance.

It seems that the long and mysterious confusions for the division by zero is on the definition. --

Indeed, when we consider the division by zero $a/0$ in the usual sense of the fundamental equation $0 \cdot z= a$, we have immediately the simple contradiction, however, we have such cases may happen, in particular, in mathematical formulas and physical formulas on the universe.

\bibliographystyle{plain}

\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{bar}

I. Barukčić,

Dialectical Logic – Negation Of Classical Logic,

http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0256

\bibitem{jake}

J. Czajko, Algebraic division by zero implemented as quasigeometric multiplication by infinity in real and complex multispatial hyperspaces,

Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com

WSN 92(2) (2018) 171-197

\bibitem{guan}

Q. Guan, A proof of Saitoh's conjecture for conjugate Hardy H2 kernels, arXiv:1712.04207.

\bibitem{kmsy}

M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,

New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$,

Int. J. Appl. Math. {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198, DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.

\bibitem{ms16}

T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,

Matrices and division by zero　z/0=0,

Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory, {\bf 6}(2016), 51-58

Published Online June 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt

\\ http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007.

\bibitem{ms18}

T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,

Division by zero calculus and singular integrals. (Submitted for publication)

\bibitem{mms18}

T. Matsuura, H. Michiwaki and S. Saitoh,

$\log 0= \log \infty =0$ and applications. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.

\bibitem{msy}

H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh and M.Yamada,

Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$. IJAPM International J. of Applied Physics and Math. {\bf 6}(2015), 1--8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html

\bibitem{mos}

H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,

Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces,

International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, {\bf 2}8(2017); Issue 1, 2017), 1-16.

\bibitem{osm}

H. Okumura, S. Saitoh and T. Matsuura, Relations of $0$ and $\infty$,

Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS), {\bf 1}(2017), 70-77.

\bibitem{os}

H. Okumura and S. Saitoh, The Descartes circles theorem and division by zero calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04961 (2017.11.14).

\bibitem{o}

H. Okumura, Wasan geometry with the division by 0. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06947 International Journal of Geometry.

\bibitem{os18}

H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,

Applications of the division by zero calculus to Wasan geometry.

(Submitted for publication).

\bibitem{ps18}

S. Pinelas and S. Saitoh,

Division by zero calculus and differential equations. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.

\bibitem{romig}

H. G. Romig, Discussions: Early History of Division by Zero,

American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. {\bf 3}1, No. 8. (Oct., 1924), pp. 387-389.

\bibitem{s97}

T. M. Rassias, Editor, Nonlinear Mathematical 　 Analysis and Applications, HadronicPress,Palm Harbor,FL34682-1577,USA:ISBN1-57485-044-X,1998, 　 pp.223–234: Nonlinear transforms and analyticity of functions, Saburou Saitoh.

\bibitem{s79}

S. Saitoh, The Bergman norm and the Szeg$\ddot{o}$ norm, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. {\bf 249} (1979), no. 2, 261--279.

\bibitem{s88}

S. Saitoh, Theory of reproducing kernels and its applications. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, {\bf 189}. Longman Scientific \& Technical, Harlow; copublished in the United States with John Wiley \& Sons, Inc., New York, 1988. x+157 pp. ISBN: 0-582-03564-3

\bibitem{s14}

S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices, Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory. {\bf 4} (2014), no. 2, 87--95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/

\bibitem{s16}

S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,

Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications - Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182. (Springer) .

\bibitem{s17}

S. Saitoh, Mysterious Properties of the Point at Infinity、

arXiv:1712.09467 [math.GM](2017.12.17).

\bibitem{s18}

S. Saitoh, Division by zero calculus (154 pages: draft): （http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/）

\bibitem{ttk}

S.-E. Takahasi, M. Tsukada and Y. Kobayashi, Classification of continuous fractional binary operations on the real and complex fields, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics, {\bf 38}(2015), no. 2, 369-380.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}